<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/</link>
	<description>Mac stuff, Tech stuff, Weird stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 06:43:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: retro t-shirts</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21809</link>
		<dc:creator>retro t-shirts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21809</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;retro t-shirts...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Curmi the Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>retro t-shirts&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Curmi the Blog &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Backing up your shit!</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21769</link>
		<dc:creator>Backing up your shit!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21769</guid>
		<description>[...] found this article which describes how to get Time Machine to play nicely with alternating drives: Curmi the Blog   So when it all arrives I&#039;ll be setting up and running time machine with a weekly trip to the old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found this article which describes how to get Time Machine to play nicely with alternating drives: Curmi the Blog   So when it all arrives I&#039;ll be setting up and running time machine with a weekly trip to the old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-01 &#171; Donghai Ma</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21697</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-08-01 &#171; Donghai Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21697</guid>
		<description>[...] Curmi the Blog Â» Blog Archive Â» Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks (tags: backup drive mac script time timemachine) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Curmi the Blog Â» Blog Archive Â» Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks (tags: backup drive mac script time timemachine) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllanMarcus</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21684</link>
		<dc:creator>AllanMarcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21684</guid>
		<description>fumanchu: even though Time Machine does and incremental backup, all the files are there to recover. In your scenario of changing files A and B, if you restore you will get whatever was current, both files, from the backup. You might have an issue if you restore on the day the back up disk is changed.

Ideally one would keep the same back up disk connected at all times. Have a second drive and use a program like SuperDuper or CCC to periodically duplicate the Time Machine drive to the second drive. If done weekly you essentially have the same level of back up but with no hacks. If you want an offsite backup, swap the secondary back up disk weekly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fumanchu: even though Time Machine does and incremental backup, all the files are there to recover. In your scenario of changing files A and B, if you restore you will get whatever was current, both files, from the backup. You might have an issue if you restore on the day the back up disk is changed.</p>
<p>Ideally one would keep the same back up disk connected at all times. Have a second drive and use a program like SuperDuper or CCC to periodically duplicate the Time Machine drive to the second drive. If done weekly you essentially have the same level of back up but with no hacks. If you want an offsite backup, swap the secondary back up disk weekly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fumanchu</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21683</link>
		<dc:creator>fumanchu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21683</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m very very interest in this cause I thought of the same thing.  Then I realized it can&#039;t work right.  Since it seems to be working for you either I&#039;m mistaken and am glad to know it or you are in for a nasty surpise when you try to restore!!

here&#039;s the issue I perceive.  suppose I&#039;m occasionally changing two files: A and B.  in week 1 I edit A but not B.   In week 2 I edit B  and A.  In week 3 I edit A again.  The I decide I need to revert my home directory.  when I do this I can&#039;t get a coherent set of A and B:  if I revert to the current time machine disk then I get last the B from 2 weeks ago and this weeks A.  

With just two files of course this is not a big deal but there&#039;s hunderds of diles many I don&#039;t even know about (e.g. preferences and application support) that won&#039;t be self consistent with each other.

to be clear by self consistent I mean that if I restore the files to a given date, then the restored image contains the files that were present on that date.

I&#039;m basing this on the assumption I made that if B got backed up last week then the OS marks B as &quot;clean&quot;.  So it won&#039;t get backed up this week (to the new disk).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m very very interest in this cause I thought of the same thing.  Then I realized it can&#8217;t work right.  Since it seems to be working for you either I&#8217;m mistaken and am glad to know it or you are in for a nasty surpise when you try to restore!!</p>
<p>here&#8217;s the issue I perceive.  suppose I&#8217;m occasionally changing two files: A and B.  in week 1 I edit A but not B.   In week 2 I edit B  and A.  In week 3 I edit A again.  The I decide I need to revert my home directory.  when I do this I can&#8217;t get a coherent set of A and B:  if I revert to the current time machine disk then I get last the B from 2 weeks ago and this weeks A.  </p>
<p>With just two files of course this is not a big deal but there&#8217;s hunderds of diles many I don&#8217;t even know about (e.g. preferences and application support) that won&#8217;t be self consistent with each other.</p>
<p>to be clear by self consistent I mean that if I restore the files to a given date, then the restored image contains the files that were present on that date.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m basing this on the assumption I made that if B got backed up last week then the OS marks B as &#8220;clean&#8221;.  So it won&#8217;t get backed up this week (to the new disk).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curmi the Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SMB, Windows, and Leopard Server</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21624</link>
		<dc:creator>Curmi the Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SMB, Windows, and Leopard Server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21624</guid>
		<description>[...] In the office we have a Mac Pro running Leopard Server. Â This machine acts as (amongst other things) a file server, providing a common area for sharing files (that are backed up as I&#8217;ve discussed previously). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the office we have a Mac Pro running Leopard Server. Â This machine acts as (amongst other things) a file server, providing a common area for sharing files (that are backed up as I&#8217;ve discussed previously). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent Links Tagged With "timemachine" - JabberTags</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21596</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent Links Tagged With "timemachine" - JabberTags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21596</guid>
		<description>[...] public links &gt;&gt; timemachine   Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks Saved by kermese on Wed 05-11-2008   Time Machine Saved by sasukeandsakurafan on Sat 01-11-2008   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] public links &gt;&gt; timemachine   Time Machine Backup to Rotating Disks Saved by kermese on Wed 05-11-2008   Time Machine Saved by sasukeandsakurafan on Sat 01-11-2008   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pemster</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21540</link>
		<dc:creator>pemster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21540</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a nice automated solution (and pretty useful to non-retards!!).

I&#039;d improve it (if you have the dollars) so that you have 5 disks, one for each day of the week. You could still keep just one off site if you need (or more) but it will give you daily incremental backups so you can recover the right version of that file you&#039;ve been working on all week before MS Word trashes it and you don&#039;t notice the mangling till 3 edits later ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice automated solution (and pretty useful to non-retards!!).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d improve it (if you have the dollars) so that you have 5 disks, one for each day of the week. You could still keep just one off site if you need (or more) but it will give you daily incremental backups so you can recover the right version of that file you&#8217;ve been working on all week before MS Word trashes it and you don&#8217;t notice the mangling till 3 edits later ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curmi</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21538</link>
		<dc:creator>curmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21538</guid>
		<description>Another limitation for those who are interested is that you must be logged in at all times for the AppleScript to trigger.  If you log out, I don&#039;t believe the script will run when you press the button.

As I said, not the perfect solution. But still a nice solution I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another limitation for those who are interested is that you must be logged in at all times for the AppleScript to trigger.  If you log out, I don&#8217;t believe the script will run when you press the button.</p>
<p>As I said, not the perfect solution. But still a nice solution I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curmi</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21537</link>
		<dc:creator>curmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21537</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing w910iROOLS.  If you want me to review the iDrum, buy me a copy. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing w910iROOLS.  If you want me to review the iDrum, buy me a copy. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w910iROOLS</title>
		<link>http://curmi.com/blog/2008/08/23/time-machine-backup-to-rotating-disks/comment-page-1/#comment-21536</link>
		<dc:creator>w910iROOLS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://curmi.com/blog/?p=288#comment-21536</guid>
		<description>Nice of you to share, but this is probably of limited use to the general pubic (sic).

What we&#039;re all waiting for is your review of iDrum for the iPhone. Bring it on Beat Boy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice of you to share, but this is probably of limited use to the general pubic (sic).</p>
<p>What we&#8217;re all waiting for is your review of iDrum for the iPhone. Bring it on Beat Boy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

