Comments on: Functions in Excel and Numbers ’09 http://curmi.com/blog/2009/01/10/functions-in-excel-and-numbers-09/ Mac stuff, Tech stuff, Weird stuff Wed, 09 May 2012 06:43:16 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: curmi http://curmi.com/blog/2009/01/10/functions-in-excel-and-numbers-09/comment-page-1/#comment-21629 curmi Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:24:44 +0000 http://curmi.com/blog/?p=415#comment-21629 Hey Lowell, I'd be interested in knowing about this too. You know you can download a free trial copy of iWork '09 from Apple's website. It's fully functional, and doesn't wipe out iWork '08. Maybe you could try your spreadsheets and report back here? Hey Lowell, I’d be interested in knowing about this too. You know you can download a free trial copy of iWork ’09 from Apple’s website. It’s fully functional, and doesn’t wipe out iWork ’08.

Maybe you could try your spreadsheets and report back here?

]]> By: Lowell Steweart http://curmi.com/blog/2009/01/10/functions-in-excel-and-numbers-09/comment-page-1/#comment-21628 Lowell Steweart Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:12:33 +0000 http://curmi.com/blog/?p=415#comment-21628 First of all, I think Numbers is great and I use it much of the time. But I wonder if they improved the performance of the Lookup functions? I have a few spreadsheets that make extensive use of lookups between tables in order to calculate various values, and while they work very nicely in Excel, they are DOG SLOW in Numbers '08. Any word on whether they have optimized performance in '09? First of all, I think Numbers is great and I use it much of the time. But I wonder if they improved the performance of the Lookup functions? I have a few spreadsheets that make extensive use of lookups between tables in order to calculate various values, and while they work very nicely in Excel, they are DOG SLOW in Numbers ’08. Any word on whether they have optimized performance in ’09?

]]>